Conditional Calibration Contracts under Coupled Load: A Branch-Aware Audit of Switched Inference
Juan S. Santillana
Abstract
Bursty serving changes both queue states and the population selected for each model. We study conditional calibration contracts as a specification to be validated, rather than a certified property of an existing router. CA-MHD combines load-coupled distillation, closed-loop replay and a cost-informed Schmitt router in a discrete-event simulator with a hardware service table. Across 40 cells (ten training seeds and four content-load coupling levels), we distinguish the original teacher, frozen wide heads on an adapted trunk, and the narrow student. A common teacher-trajectory audit has median absolute student-teacher deficit 0.06 percentage points, but does not certify the student-selected deployment support. Historical results use a kernel correctness gap, not the published SmoothECE; we separately prove selected-branch composition for a residual functional at a common fixed scale. The deployed wide branch has lower ordinal accuracy than the original teacher in all 40 cells. Same-checkpoint student-only serving has lower historical ordinal gap in 27/40 cells; routing also exposes violation tails up to 17.5 percent. Student p99 latency remains above the 1.5 ms target. Retrospective temporal recalibration improves the ordinal gap in 39/40 cells, but causal delayed-label availability is unverified and no incremental per-mode benefit is detected after multiplicity adjustment. An in-sample CUSUM detects 30/40 checkpoint changes at five historical false alarms, with no prospective false-alarm guarantee. These findings support a branch-aware audit and a scoped negative result, not demonstrated routing superiority. Independent budgets, selected-support validation and net utility under a satisfied SLA remain open.