PaperScope
LIVE · 2026-10-15 05:40 UTC

What Does LALM Post-training Learn? Rethinking Audio Understanding and Reasoning Capabilities

Hua-Hsuan Chen, Xuanjun Chen, Wei-Chung Lu, Chih-Kai Yang, Yu-Xiang Lin, Sung-Feng Huang, Haibin Wu, Hung-yi Lee

Latestcs.CLcs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
arXiv ID
2610.19476 v1
Submitted
2026-10-14

Abstract

Post-training often improves the performance of large audio-language models on audio understanding and reasoning benchmarks. However, these improvements may reflect adaptation to specific question formats, such as multiple-choice questions, rather than genuine advances in audio understanding and reasoning capabilities. To investigate what LALMs actually learn from post-training, we conduct controlled experiments that disentangle improvements in audio understanding from adaptation to specific question formats. Across different models and post-training methods, we find that much of the reported improvement persists even without informative audio, but largely disappears when the question format changes. These findings suggest that post-training often teaches models to exploit task-specific textual cues and answer patterns rather than developing generalizable audio understanding and reasoning capabilities.

Comment: Work in progress

arXiv abs page · PDF · same-day batch