PaperScope
LIVE · 2026-10-15 05:40 UTC

Reference Wording Shapes Retrieval of Robot Task Instructions

Jahnavi Yelamanchi

Latestcs.CLcs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
arXiv ID
2610.17549 v1
Submitted
2026-10-13

Abstract

Identifying a robot task from a short instruction is sensitive to which descriptions are available for retrieval. We investigate this effect in the natural-language instructions included with the RLBench manipulation benchmark. We extract 296 fixed descriptions from 62 publicly available task files and compare five training-free lexical rankers over 80 random choices of one indexed description per task. Exact strings assigned to conflicting task labels are excluded from the primary score. Character n-gram TF-IDF achieves 61.3% mean top-1 accuracy on the resulting held-out instructions, compared with 55.6% for BM25 and 54.9% for word TF-IDF. Across gallery choices, character TF-IDF ranges from 55.2% to 66.8%; its 5th-95th percentile range is 56.9%-64.8%. Adding a second indexed description improves character TF-IDF by 7.0 percentage points on matched queries. These results quantify the influence of reference wording and representation choice on instruction-to-task retrieval under a consistent evaluation protocol.

Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures, 4 tables

arXiv abs page · PDF · same-day batch