PaperScope
LIVE · 2026-10-09 05:40 UTC

Evaluating Local Language Model Agents for Reproducible Data Engineering: An Empirical Software Engineering Study of Mobility Workflows

Jorge García-Carrasco, Javier Sanchis, Alejandro Reina-Reina, Alejandro Maté, Juan Trujillo

Latestcs.CLcs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
arXiv ID
2610.11482 v1
Submitted
2026-10-08

Abstract

Context: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used as software and data-engineering assistants, yet evidence about locally deployable open-weight agents remains limited. Existing evaluations often emphasize textual responses or isolated code generation rather than the validity of complete engineering artifacts. Objectives: We evaluate whether local LLM agents can produce correct and reproducible data-engineering artifacts, quantify the effect of a closed-loop workspace condition, and examine trade-offs in model scale, architecture, quantization, runtime, tool use, and failure. Methods: We introduce a benchmark of fifteen mobility-workflow tasks covering data discovery, connectors, transport-feed processing, semantic enrichment, feature engineering, validation, visualization, and reporting. Deterministic checkers assess generated scripts, tables, structured files, figures, and reports. Ten local configurations are evaluated in one-shot and closed-loop conditions, with five repetitions per model, mode, and task, yielding 1,500 scored attempts on a consumer-grade GPU. Results: Among models larger than two billion parameters, the workspace condition increases pass rates by 26.7-52.0 percentage points over one-shot generation. The strongest configuration reaches 85.3% artifact-level success, and a quantized 9-billion-parameter model reaches 69.3% with an approximately 6.5 GB memory footprint. Gains are largest when intermediate artifacts expose errors the agent can inspect and repair. Conclusion: Local open-weight agents can support a meaningful subset of software-intensive data-engineering work, but reliability depends on model capability, task verifiability, and deterministic validation. The benchmark provides a reproducible method for evaluating complete agent configurations before adoption in engineering workflows.

Comment: Preprint, under review. 26 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables. Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21397610

arXiv abs page · PDF · same-day batch