PaperScope
LIVE · 2026-10-02 05:40 UTC

HydroJEV: A one-second, training-free screen for cyber-attack and fault attribution in water distribution networks

Tianwei Mu, Shengyan Jiang, Mingzhe Yuan, Qing Luo, Min Xiao, Wenhong Wang, Jun Li, Manhong Huang

Latestcs.CLcs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
arXiv ID
2610.02048 v1
Category
Submitted
2026-10-01

Abstract

When a SCADA alarm is raised in a water distribution network, operators must decide quickly whether it reflects a cyberattack, a physical fault, a normal transient or a faulty sensor. Supervised classifiers need labelled incidents that utilities rarely have, and frontier large language models (LLMs) take tens of seconds per decision. We tested whether Jev, a training-free model that returns class probabilities in about one second, can serve as the first tier of this triage. On a four-class cause-attribution benchmark built on the C-Town network in EPANET, Jev was compared with a hand-written rule tree, a supervised classifier and seven cloud LLMs on identical evidence in four sealed, pre-registered rounds. With only a label-free prior correction, Jev matched the rule tree (macro-F1 0.62-0.64 against 0.56-0.61 in distribution) and exceeded the supervised classifier by 0.36-0.42 on event subtypes absent from its labels, in all four rounds, and it outperformed the classifier whenever fewer than about four labelled events per class were available. Jev also decided 20-40 times faster than frontier LLMs. Accepting only benign Jev verdicts confirmed by the rule tree spared an LLM reviewer 35-38% of windows on fresh sealed sets without loss of macro-F1. Transferred unchanged to two further networks, this gated cascade stayed within the non-inferiority margin of its reviewer on all four sets. A fast, training-free screen can therefore take over about a third of the review load in SCADA anomaly triage while preserving the accuracy of deliberate review.

Comment: 41 pages, 19 figures

arXiv abs page · PDF · same-day batch