Benchmarking EEG Foundation Models at Scale: Lessons from 20,000 Evaluations
Zhige Chen, Shu Peng, Chengxuan Qin, Rui Liu, Rui Yang, Kay Chen Tan, Jibin Wu
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models (FMs) promise transferable neural representations, yet their advantages over strong supervised baselines and their prospects for further scaling remain unclear. To address these questions, we introduce EEG-Arena, an open-source benchmark covering 30 EEG FMs and 25 supervised baselines evaluated on 57 downstream tasks from 23 public datasets. Through more than 20,000 evaluations across five experimental protocols, we assess downstream performance, pretraining benefits, model size scaling, pretraining data scaling, and robustness to channel configuration. We find that (1) EEG FMs outperform strong task-specific supervised baselines on most evaluated tasks, particularly under non-bipolar settings; (2) compared with architecture-matched supervised training from scratch, pretraining improves both early optimization and final downstream performance, with larger and more consistent gains as more labeled downstream data become available; (3) existing EEG FMs do not exhibit a consistent positive relationship between parameter count and downstream performance; (4) under a fixed architecture, increasing the pretraining data scale yields sustained downstream gains; and (5) channel-flexible FMs achieve higher absolute performance than channel-constrained models across most evaluated channel configurations. Together, these findings demonstrate the downstream value of EEG FMs and identify pretraining data expansion as a promising direction for further progress. To support continued research, we release EEG-Arena as an open-source evaluation framework that provides shared infrastructure for reproducible benchmarking, model comparison, and community-driven development.