Evaluating the Semantic-to-Geometric Gap in Adversarial Defenses Against Vision-Language Model-Based Plagiarism
Christopher Burger, Christina Trotter, Joseph Carlisle, Charles Walter
Abstract
The rapidly advancing capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs) present a systemic challenge to academic integrity. VLMs now allow students to bypass meaningful engagement by capturing and submitting graphical problems as singular images, a practice we define as trivial plagiarism. To provide educators with actionable data on VLM limitations, we investigate the efficacy of heuristic adversarial image transformations designed to degrade model performance while remaining human-interpretable. Through a two-phase evaluation of introductory assessments, we manually assess baseline VLM performance on circuit diagrams, followed by an automated large-scale evaluation of topological structures (logic gates) and coordinate geometry (Karnaugh maps). We find that while highly capable VLMs can exhibit appreciable robustness, all models suffer vulnerability to adversarial perturbations. We conclude that while visual perturbations act as a viable near-term stopgap, long-term assessment security requires educators to reapproach assessment design given continually increasing VLM performance.