Measuring the Creativity of Frontier LLMs in Automated Research
Yiheng Zhao, Mengzhuo Chen, Chengming Hu, Pengyi Liao, Yiran Pang
Abstract
Frontier LLMs are increasingly capable of conducting automated research, yet their creativity in this setting has not been systematically evaluated. In this paper, we propose a set of metrics to evaluate creativity along the two dimensions of valueness and novelty. Valueness assesses whether each proposed idea is useful, while novelty is evaluated from three perspectives: whether the same idea has appeared before (Exact-Match P-Novelty), whether a previously unexplored variable or variable combination is explored (Variable-level P-Novelty), and whether the idea directly follows retrieved external knowledge or departs from it (H-Novelty). Our evaluation shows that the models achieve relatively similar scores on most creativity metrics, but differ substantially in Variable-level P-Novelty, which reflects the breadth of research-space exploration. Further correlation and idea-level performance analyses show that Variable-level P-Novelty is the creativity dimension most strongly associated with research performance.